Submissions and registration in one place.
Abstracts and registration fall at very different times and are therefore usually kept apart, but they can also be combined in one form. The choice is yours.
All solutions
Axaco Air /Abstract management
Make room for the research. Not the admin.
For universities, research conferences and congresses, the submissions are the core of the programme. Collect abstracts and manage the review in the same system as participant registration, in a flow built together with you.
- The abstract process is built together with you
- Abstract collection in the same system as registration
- Double-blind review when you want it
- For universities, congresses and scientific conferences
The flow step by step
From submission to presentation.
A typical abstract management flow. Roles and steps are set together with you.
Step 1
Author
Submits their abstract
Step 2
Conference administrator
Receives and assigns submissions
Step 3
Reviewer
Assesses and comments on submissions
Step 4
Scientific committee
Decides on acceptance and presentation format
Step 5
Author
Is notified and presents at the conference
Illustrative example
A review process defined by your needs.
The number of reviewers per abstract, how many review rounds you want and which presentation type is visible to whom are set up in conversation with you. You do not review according to our system – the system is built around your needs.
“Double blind” review.
The review can of course be built on the double-blind review principle, where neither authors nor reviewers see who stands behind a submission or who reviews it.
Keep the review together.
Each reviewer gets their own portal with the abstracts assigned to them. There they read, score and comment on the submissions. The organising committee can follow the review in their system reports instead of sending lists back and forth.